They also lose money games and salary caps, and foreigners’ multi-year contracts are “unexpected.”

The hot topic of the KBO League stove league this winter is “multi-year contract” for foreign players. The NC Dinos considered a multi-year contract to catch Eric Peddy, the MVP of this season’s league, and the Samsung Lions also offered a two-year contract or more to keep ace David Buchanan. In order to catch players who have displayed outstanding performances in the league, the club is proposing a multi-year contract that guarantees a period and a certain amount of money.

However, multi-year contracts are unlikely again this year. Peddy left for the U.S. Major League (Chicago White Sox), and Samsung has also failed to narrow differences with Buchanan. This year is not the only year. Five years have passed since the KBO League stipulated multi-year contracts for foreign players in 2019, but none of them signed multi-year contracts.

From the club’s perspective, they can have outstanding foreign players for a long time through multi-year contracts. From the player’s point of view, they can secure job security. If they do well, the contract would be a “win-win” for both the club and the players, but why wouldn’t it be successful.

The reason is clear. Under the current KBO League system, there are too many restrictions to conclude multi-year contracts, including restrictions on foreign players, money games with Major League Baseball (MLB) and Japanese professional baseball (NPB), and restrictions on foreign salary cap.

From the club’s point of view, multi-year contracts pose not only expected profits but also risks. “Multi-year contracts are too risky compared to the amount of money,” the head of the club A said. “It would be a huge blow to the club if they have to replace the player at a time when they have already invested a lot of money including down payment.” They argue that there are many things to bear, including financial losses due to injury and lackluster departure, disruption in power plans, and concerns over possible burnout.

Compared to NPB, this risk is more pronounced. NPB has no restriction on foreign player retention. It can manage injury risk as it has spare resources that can be filled in even if there is a defector. Proven multi-year contracts of players are less burdensome and common. On the other hand, KBO, which has only three foreign players in possession restrictions, suffers a big blow even if only one player is excluded. In addition to financial losses, the power structure is greatly distorted. If a multi-year contract player leaves, the loss is even greater. 랭크카지노

A more realistic problem is the amount of money. The KBO League has been implementing the salary cap system for foreign players since 2023. The total amount of contracts for three foreigners cannot exceed 4 million dollars. Even if a multi-year contract is offered, it is often behind in the money game between the U.S. and Japan due to a limited amount.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *